Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 73.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0, 5.1 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2015-07-28 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 599.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto X Style's global score of 73.8. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it's also much thinner and a little lighter than Moto X Style. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a more recent 10 version while Moto X Style has Android 6.0 version, so it provides lots of additional features and optimized performance.
Moto X Style counts with a brighter screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel number per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a faster processor than Moto X Style, because it has more cores and more RAM memory.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture, faster 60 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Moto X Style, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has superior battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a little more expensive than Moto X Style, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.