Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
54.857.9
Basic Information
Amazon
Android 5.0 LollipopAndroid 14
2015-09-30--
10.31 x 6.26 x 0.30 inches--
15.24 ounces18.84 ounces
Black and WhiteSpace Grey; Sky Blue
$ 260.00--
Display / Screen
10.1 inches10.9 inches
800 x 1280 pixels --
IPS LCD IPS LCD
149 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.15.8
Performance
MediaTek chipsetUnisoc T606 chipset
Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
1 GB RAM8 GB RAM
Yes GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.378.91
Storage
32 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
8.1210.1
Camera
5.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution--
5.57.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
--Nano SIM
2.40
Battery Life
--7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
1.368.8
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0
--GPS
AccelerometerAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

OSCAL Pad 90 is slightly better than Amazon Fire HD 10, with a overall score of 57.9 against 54.8. The OSCAL Pad 90 is a somewhat heavier but extremely thinner tablet than the Amazon Fire HD 10. Both tablets in this comparison review include Android OS, but OSCAL Pad 90 has the previous 14 version and Amazon Fire HD 10 has Android 5.0 Lollipop version.

OSCAL Pad 90 has just a little better processing power than Amazon Fire HD 10, because it has more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Amazon Fire HD 10 has a bit sharper screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a quite smaller screen. OSCAL Pad 90 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Amazon Fire HD 10, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.

OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a really longer battery performance than Amazon Fire HD 10. The OSCAL Pad 90 features a lot better camera than Amazon Fire HD 10, because it has a lot more megapixels back camera.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.