Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
58.657.9
Basic Information
Amazon
Android 9.0 PieAndroid 14
2020-05-14--
7.95 x 5.39 x 0.38 inches--
12.52 ounces18.84 ounces
Black, Plum, Twilight blue and WhiteSpace Grey; Sky Blue
$ 90.00--
Display / Screen
8 inches10.9 inches
1280 x 800 pixels --
IPS LCD IPS LCD
189 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.65.8
Performance
MediaTek MT8168 chipsetUnisoc T606 chipset
Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
2 GB RAM8 GB RAM
Mali G52 MC1 GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.738.91
Storage
32 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
11.0810.1
Camera
2.00 MP + 2.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution--
5.287.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
--Nano SIM
2.40
Battery Life
--7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
1.368.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020) is a bit better than the OSCAL Pad 90, with a 58.6 score against 57.9. These devices have Android OS, but the Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020) has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 version. The OSCAL Pad 90 has a bit better CPU than Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020), because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.

Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020) features a brighter display than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a really smaller screen. OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a way better camera than Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020), because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels. Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020) has a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB.

OSCAL Pad 90 has a very superior battery duration than Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020).




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.