Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
67.964.4
Basic Information
Amazon
Android 4.4Android 13
2014-10-212023-08-20
9.10 x 6.20 x 0.30 inches9.89 x 6.70 x 0.59 inches
13.23 ounces30.12 ounces
--Plastic and Plastic
$ 479.00--
Display / Screen
8.9 inches10.1 inches
2560 x 1600 pixels 1920 x 1200 pixels
LCDIPS LCD
339 pixels per inch224 pixels per inch
--360 cd/m2 brightness
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
8.77.3
Performance
Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipsetUnisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) chipset
Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor
2 GB (800 MHz) RAM8 GB RAM
Adreno 420 Blaze GPUMali-G57 MC1 GPU
9.099.18
Storage
64 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot
7.715.42
Camera
8.00 MP13.00 MP + 16.00 MP
f/2.20 aperture--
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution--
6.827.04
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile Hotspot--
LTE (4G), HSPA, EDGE and GPRS--
6.32.4
Battery Life
--13000mAh Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
1.3612
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.1Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Amazon Fire HDX 8.9 has an overall score of 67.9, which is slightly better than the OSCAL Spider 8's 64.4 score. Both tablets in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Amazon Fire HDX 8.9 has an older 4.4 version while OSCAL Spider 8 has Android 13 version. Amazon Fire HDX 8.9 is an noticeably older portable tablet than OSCAL Spider 8, but Amazon managed to build it a lot thinner and much lighter anyway.

OSCAL Spider 8 features just a bit better hardware performance than Amazon Fire HDX 8.9, because it has more RAM memory and more cpu cores. Amazon Fire HDX 8.9 has a more vivid screen than OSCAL Spider 8, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1600 x 2560.

OSCAL Spider 8 has a bit better camera than Amazon Fire HDX 8.9, because it has a much more mega pixels camera in the back. The OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Amazon Fire HDX 8.9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.

The OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a much better battery life than Amazon Fire HDX 8.9.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.