| Global Score | |
| 68.5 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Amazon | |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 13 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2023-08-20 |
| 9.09 x 6.22 x 0.31 inches | 9.89 x 6.70 x 0.59 inches |
| 13.55 ounces | 30.12 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.9 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 339 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 360 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8074 chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 6.82 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | -- |
| 6.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 13000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
The Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 is just a bit better than the OSCAL Spider 8, having a 68.5 score against 64.4. Despite of the fact that the Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 is notably older than the OSCAL Spider 8, it's body is much lighter and way thinner. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 has the newer 4.2.2 version while OSCAL Spider 8 has Android 13 version, so it gives you lots of additional features.
The Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 has a way better display than OSCAL Spider 8, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little brighter display, a way greater screen density and a higher resolution of 1600 x 2560px. OSCAL Spider 8 features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Spider 8 and Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 count with similar CPUs, because although the OSCAL Spider 8 has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more processing cores (although slower) and a greater amount of RAM memory. The OSCAL Spider 8 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9, because it has a much more megapixels back facing camera.
The OSCAL Spider 8 has a much better battery performance than Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.