Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
85.957.9
Basic Information
Apple
--Android 14
2019-03-18--
9.80 x 6.80 x 0.24 inches--
16.37 ounces18.84 ounces
Gold, Gray and SilverSpace Grey; Sky Blue
Aluminum --
$ 779.00--
Display / Screen
10.5 inches10.9 inches
2224 x 1668 pixels --
IPS LCD IPS LCD
265 pixels per inch--
500 cd/m2 brightness--
No touch screenNo touch screen
7.85.8
Performance
Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 chipsetUnisoc T606 chipset
64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2490 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
3 GB RAM8 GB RAM
Apple 4-core GPU GPUMali-G57 GPU
10.358.91
Storage
256 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
13.310.1
Camera
8.00 MP + 7.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
f/2.40 aperturef/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution--
8.917.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA--
Nano SIM, Dual SIMNano SIM
6.10
Battery Life
8134mAh Li - Ion Battery7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
9.048.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Fingerprint ID Scanner--
Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Apple iPad Air (2019) has an overall score of 85.9, which is a lot better than OSCAL Pad 90's global score of 57.9. IPad Air (2019) counts with a much better screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a quite smaller screen. The iPad Air (2019) has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.

Apple iPad Air (2019) has a more powerful processing unit than OSCAL Pad 90, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Apple iPad Air (2019) also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Apple iPad Air (2019) has a little better battery duration than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has a 6% more battery size.

Apple iPad Air (2019) counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a tinier aperture and a lot less megapixels resolution back-facing camera.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.