Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
62.259.3
Basic Information
Asus
--Android 14
2015-07-10--
8.00 x 5.30 x 0.26 inches--
10.51 ounces17.46 ounces
16 777 216Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
Display / Screen
8 inches10.5 inches
2048 x 1536 pixels --
IPS LCD IPS LCD
320 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
7.65.8
Performance
Intel Atom Z3580 chipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset
64-bit, 22 nm (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
4 GB RAM6 GB RAM
PowerVR G6430 GPUMali-G57 GPU
98.82
Storage
64 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
10.0213.3
Camera
8.00 MP + 5.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution--
6.497.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
Mobile Hotspot--
30
Battery Life
Ni - MH Battery8200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
1.369.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.0
GPS--
Accelerometer, Compass and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Asus ZenPad S 8.0 is slightly better than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, having a 62.2 score against 59.3. Asus ZenPad S 8.0 features a much sharper screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a lot smaller screen. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Asus ZenPad S 8.0, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.

The Asus ZenPad S 8.0 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and lesser cores (although they are faster). OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a very superior battery duration than Asus ZenPad S 8.0. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a lot better camera than Asus ZenPad S 8.0, because it has a way higher 13 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.