Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 59.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Fujitsu | |
| Android 12 | Windows 8 Pro |
| 2023-04-17 | -- |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 29.92 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | -- |
| $ 140.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AH-IPS |
| 214 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | -- |
| processor | Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | SD, SDHC external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a general score of 59.2, which is slightly better than the Blackview Oscal Pad 13's 57.3 score. Even being the best device in our current comparison, the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 design is notably heavier and noticeably thicker than the Blackview Oscal Pad 13. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 comes with Windows 8 Pro OS, while Blackview Oscal Pad 13 counts with Android 12 OS.
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has just a bit better screen than Blackview Oscal Pad 13, because although it has a lot lower screen pixel density and a way lower resolution of 768 x 1366px, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 features a much more powerful processing unit than Blackview Oscal Pad 13, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Blackview Oscal Pad 13 has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702. They have the same 256 GB internal storage. Blackview Oscal Pad 13 takes a lot better photos and videos than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Blackview Oscal Pad 13 features a much better battery life than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has 7680mAh of battery capacity.
Although Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Blackview Oscal Pad 13, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Blackview Oscal Pad 13. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Blackview Oscal Pad 13, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.