Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 65.2 | 59.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Fujitsu | |
| Android 13 | Windows 8 Pro |
| 2024-01-20 | -- |
| 9.71 x 6.33 x 0.29 inches | 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches |
| 18.17 ounces | 29.92 ounces |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.5 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AH-IPS |
| 216 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| 360 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | -- |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | SD, SDHC external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Battery | 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 9.12 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 is better than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, with a 65.2 score against 59.2. The Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 works with Android 13 OS, and Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with Windows 8 Pro OS. Blackview OSCAL Pad 16's construction is way lighter and extremely thinner than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702.
Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 counts with a little sharper screen than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1200 x 1920px resolution and a much better number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702's CPU is just as good as Blackview OSCAL Pad 16's CPU, because although the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU.
Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702. They have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 has a superior battery life than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3150mAh.
Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.