Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 65.2 | 74.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4 |
| 2024-01-20 | 2014-01-06 |
| 9.71 x 6.33 x 0.29 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.29 inches |
| 18.17 ounces | 16.54 ounces |
| -- | White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 539.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.5 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| 216 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| 360 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Battery | 8220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.12 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 is much better than the Blackview OSCAL Pad 16, with a 74.6 score against 65.2. The Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 is a a little bit lighter tablet than Blackview OSCAL Pad 16, but both are 0.29inches thick. These tablets have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 has an older 4.4 version while Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 has Android 13.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 counts with a better display than Blackview OSCAL Pad 16, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1600 x 2560. The Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 has just a bit better performance than Blackview OSCAL Pad 16, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1, because it has a much higher resolution back facing camera. The Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 counts with a battery life that's just as good as the Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 one, although the Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 also has 8220mAh of battery capacity instead of 8200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.