Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 59.2 | 65.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Fujitsu | |
| Windows 8 Pro | Android 13 |
| -- | 2024-01-20 |
| 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches | 9.71 x 6.33 x 0.29 inches |
| 29.92 ounces | 18.17 ounces |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11.6 inches | 10.5 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| AH-IPS | IPS LCD |
| 135 pixels per inch | 216 pixels per inch |
| -- | 360 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| SD, SDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 5.5 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 is much better than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, with a global score of 65.2 against 59.2. The Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 comes with Android 13 OS, while Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 works with Windows 8 Pro OS. The Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 is a much lighter and much thinner portable tablet than the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702.
The Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 has a bit more vivid display than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1200 x 1920 pixels and a lot greater pixels density. The Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702. Both of them have equal 256 GB internal storage.
Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 has a processor that is just as good as the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 one, because although the Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and more RAM memory. Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 has a way better battery lifetime than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3150mAh.
The Blackview OSCAL Pad 16 shoots greater photos and videos than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.