Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 59.2 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Fujitsu | HP |
| Windows 8 Pro | Windows 8.1 |
| -- | 2014-02-23 |
| 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 29.92 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11.6 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| AH-IPS | -- |
| 135 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.9 | 7.8 |
| Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU | Intel GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| SD, SDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 5.5 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is just a bit better than HP ProPad 600, getting a score of 59.2 against 58.2. Although it's the best we compare here, the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 design is notably thicker and extremely heavier than HP ProPad 600. These tablets come with Windows OS (Operating System), but the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has older 8 Pro version and HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1.
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with a little bit better performance than HP ProPad 600, because although it has lesser CPU cores (although faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 also counts with a graphics co-processor. The HP ProPad 600 has a brighter screen than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher pixels number per display inch and a much better resolution of 1200 x 1920.
The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 features a very superior storage for apps and games than HP ProPad 600, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The HP ProPad 600 counts with a much longer battery life than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has an 8380mAh battery size.
HP ProPad 600 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher 8 MP resolution.
Although Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HP ProPad 600, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HP ProPad 600. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy HP ProPad 600, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.