Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 59.2 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Fujitsu | |
| Windows 8 Pro | Android 13 |
| 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches | 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches |
| 29.92 ounces | 15.84 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11.6 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1200 x 1200 pixels |
| AH-IPS | IPS LCD |
| 135 pixels per inch | 163 pixels per inch |
| -- | 330 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| SD, SDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 5.5 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8280mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OSCAL Pad 15 is slightly better than the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, having a overall score of 64.4 against 59.2. The OSCAL Pad 15 is a way lighter and extremely thinner portable tablet than the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702. The OSCAL Pad 15 works with Android 13 OS, and Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 works with Windows 8 Pro OS.
OSCAL Pad 15's processor is very similar to the processing unit in Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although the OSCAL Pad 15 has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores (although they are slower) and a greater amount of RAM. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a bit more vivid screen than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a little lower resolution of 768 x 1366px and a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
OSCAL Pad 15 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702. Both have equal internal memory. OSCAL Pad 15 has a superior battery lifetime than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has an 8280mAh battery capacity. The OSCAL Pad 15 features a greater camera than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a lot better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.