Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 59.2 | 57.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Fujitsu | |
| Windows 8 Pro | Android 14 |
| 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches | -- |
| 29.92 ounces | 18.84 ounces |
| -- | Space Grey; Sky Blue |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11.6 inches | 10.9 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | -- |
| AH-IPS | IPS LCD |
| 135 pixels per inch | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Unisoc T606 chipset |
| Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| SD, SDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 5.5 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery | 7700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 8.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a general score of 59.2, which is a little bit better than the OSCAL Pad 90's overall score of 57.9. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has Windows 8 Pro operating system, while OSCAL Pad 90 counts with Android 14 operating system. The OSCAL Pad 90's CPU is just as good as the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 one, because although the OSCAL Pad 90 has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with a better screen than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has a little larger display. The OSCAL Pad 90 counts with a way better camera than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has more internal memory.
OSCAL Pad 90 features a superior battery performance than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a 144 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.