Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
59.259.3
Basic Information
Fujitsu
Windows 8 ProAndroid 14
11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches--
29.92 ounces17.46 ounces
--Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue
$ 1149.00--
Display / Screen
11.6 inches10.5 inches
1366 x 768 pixels --
AH-IPSIPS LCD
135 pixels per inch--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
6.95.8
Performance
--Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset
Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM6 GB RAM
Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.918.82
Storage
256 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
SD, SDHC external memory slotNo SD card slot
13.313.3
Camera
5.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution--
5.57.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
2.40
Battery Life
3150mAh Li-Ion Battery8200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
5.129.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 5.0
AccelerometerAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi is slightly better than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, with a 59.3 score against 59.2. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14 OS, and Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 comes with Windows 8 Pro OS. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi body is notably thinner and lighter than the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 features a brighter display than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because it has a little bit larger display.

The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with a bit better processing unit than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a GPU. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has as much memory to store more apps and games as Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, and although the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has no slot for external memory cards, they both have exactly the same internal storage.

OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a very superior camera than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a lot higher 13 MP resolution back facing camera. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a way better battery life than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3150mAh.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.