Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 59.2 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Fujitsu | Xiaomi |
| Windows 8 Pro | Android |
| -- | 2014-05-15 |
| 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches | 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches |
| 29.92 ounces | 12.70 ounces |
| $ 1149.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11.6 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| AH-IPS | -- |
| 135 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset |
| Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU | Kepler GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| SD, SDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 8.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi MiPad is a little bit better than the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, having a 64.4 score against 59.2. Xiaomi MiPad counts with Android operating system, while Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with Windows 8 Pro operating system. The Xiaomi MiPad is a incredibly lighter and way thinner tablet than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702.
Xiaomi MiPad features a sharper screen than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixels number per inch in the screen and a much better 2048 x 1536px resolution. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi MiPad counts with a processor that is very similar to Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702's processor, because although the Xiaomi MiPad has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 2 more cores. The Xiaomi MiPad shoots much better videos and photos than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi MiPad also has a back facing camera with a much higher 8 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi MiPad features a way better battery life than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has 6700mAh of battery capacity against 3150mAh.
The Xiaomi MiPad is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.