Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
59.257.7
Basic Information
FujitsuXiaomi
Windows 8 ProAndroid 12, 11
--2021-09-23
11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 inches
29.92 ounces18.03 ounces
--Cosmic Black and Pearl White
$ 1149.00--
Display / Screen
11.6 inches11 inches
1366 x 768 pixels 2560 x 1600 pixels
AH-IPSIPS LCD
135 pixels per inch274 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
6.96.6
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset
Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processorKryo 485 Gold, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3 MHz) processor
4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM6 GB RAM
Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPUAdreno 640 GPU
8.913.78
Storage
256 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
SD, SDHC external memory slotNo SD card slot
13.310.1
Camera
5.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution
5.59.46
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
2.42.4
Battery Life
3150mAh Li-Ion Battery8720mAh Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
5.129.44
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 5.0
AccelerometerAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a bit better than Xiaomi pad 5, with a 59.2 score against 57.7. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a extremely heavier and much thicker tablet than the Xiaomi pad 5. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 works with Windows 8 Pro OS, and Xiaomi pad 5 works with Android 12 OS. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 features just a bit better display than Xiaomi pad 5, because although it has a much lower resolution of 768 x 1366px and a lot worse count of pixels in each screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen.

The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 features a very superior performance than Xiaomi pad 5, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Xiaomi pad 5 shoots greater pictures and videos than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.

The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi pad 5, because it has more internal memory. The Xiaomi pad 5 has a very superior battery lifetime than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has 8720mAh of battery capacity.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.