Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
59.457.9
Basic Information
Google
Android 6.0Android 14
2015-09-29--
9.53 x 7.05 x 0.28 inches--
17.60 ounces18.84 ounces
--Space Grey; Sky Blue
Aluminum--
$ 645.00--
Display / Screen
10.2 inches10.9 inches
2560 x 1800 pixels --
LCDIPS LCD
307 pixels per inch--
500 cd/m2 brightness--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
95.8
Performance
NVIDIA Tegra X1 chipsetUnisoc T606 chipset
processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
3 GB RAM8 GB RAM
NVIDIA Maxwell GPUMali-G57 GPU
6.038.91
Storage
64 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
7.710.1
Camera
8.00 MP + 2.10 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution--
6.497.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
--Nano SIM
2.40
Battery Life
--7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
1.368.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.1Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Google Pixel C is a little bit better than the OSCAL Pad 90, having a score of 59.4 against 57.9. Both tablets we are comparing have Android operating system, but Google Pixel C has 6.0 version while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14. OSCAL Pad 90 has a much better performing CPU than Google Pixel C, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.

The Google Pixel C counts with an incredibly better screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a quite smaller screen. OSCAL Pad 90 captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel C, because it has a camera in the back with a way better 13 MP resolution. OSCAL Pad 90 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel C, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.

The OSCAL Pad 90 features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel C.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.