Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
59.459.3
Basic Information
Google
Android 6.0Android 14
2015-09-29--
9.53 x 7.05 x 0.28 inches--
17.60 ounces17.46 ounces
--Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue
Aluminum--
$ 645.00--
Display / Screen
10.2 inches10.5 inches
2560 x 1800 pixels --
LCDIPS LCD
307 pixels per inch--
500 cd/m2 brightness--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
95.8
Performance
NVIDIA Tegra X1 chipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset
processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
3 GB RAM6 GB RAM
NVIDIA Maxwell GPUMali-G57 GPU
6.038.82
Storage
64 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
7.713.3
Camera
8.00 MP + 2.10 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution--
6.497.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
2.40
Battery Life
--8200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
1.369.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.1Bluetooth 5.0
GPS--
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The Google Pixel C is a little bit better than the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, having a global score of 59.4 against 59.3. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel C has the older 6.0 version while OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has Android 14 version. The Google Pixel C features a much better looking screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a bit smaller screen.

OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has much more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel C, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a lot better performance than Google Pixel C, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 7 more processing cores.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel C. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel C, because it has a back camera with a lot higher resolution.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.