Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 59.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Fujitsu |
| Windows 8.1 | Windows 8 Pro |
| 2014-02-23 | -- |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 29.92 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| -- | AH-IPS |
| 224 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 6.9 |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Intel GPU | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | SD, SDHC external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is slightly better than the HP ProPad 600, getting a general score of 59.2 against 58.2. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a extremely heavier and much thicker tablet device than HP ProPad 600. Both of these tablets use Windows operating system, but Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has an older 8 Pro version and HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1 version.
HP ProPad 600 has a better looking screen than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1200 x 1920. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HP ProPad 600, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with just a little better hardware performance than HP ProPad 600, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 also counts with a GPU. The HP ProPad 600 has a much better battery life than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity against 3150mAh.
HP ProPad 600 shoots much better pictures and videos than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Although Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a better device, it costs a lot more than HP ProPad 600, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HP ProPad 600. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get HP ProPad 600, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.