Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 64.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | LG |
| Windows 8.1 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-02-23 | -- |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 8.30 x 4.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 10.90 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 155.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 283 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Intel GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.36 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| 2.4 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
LG G Pad III 8.0 is much better than HP ProPad 600, getting a general score of 64.3 against 58.2. LG G Pad III 8.0 comes with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system, while HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1 operating system. LG G Pad III 8.0's body is notably thinner and extremely lighter than the HP ProPad 600.
HP ProPad 600 counts with just a bit better screen than LG G Pad III 8.0, because although it has a little bit worse display pixels density, and they both have exactly the same 1200 x 1920px resolution, the HP ProPad 600 also counts with a larger screen. The LG G Pad III 8.0 has a little better performance than HP ProPad 600, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores.
HP ProPad 600 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than LG G Pad III 8.0, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels. The LG G Pad III 8.0 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than HP ProPad 600, although it has only 16 GB internal memory capacity.
The HP ProPad 600 features a much longer battery duration than LG G Pad III 8.0, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity instead of 4800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.