Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 66 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Nokia |
| Windows 8.1 | Android 5.0 |
| 2014-02-23 | 2014-11-18 |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 7.90 x 5.46 x 0.27 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 11.22 ounces |
| -- | Gray |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 370.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Intel Atom chipset |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Z3580 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Intel GPU | PowerVR G6430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 2.4 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5300mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia N1 is much better than HP ProPad 600, with a global score of 66 against 58.2. Even though the Nokia N1 and HP ProPad 600 were released only a few months apart, the Nokia N1 is a lot lighter and incredibly thinner. Nokia N1 works with Android 5.0 OS, and HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1 OS. Nokia N1 counts with a better looking screen than HP ProPad 600, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 2048 x 1536 and a better screen density.
Nokia N1 counts with a superior performance than HP ProPad 600, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have 4 cpu cores, the Nokia N1 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64 bits processor. Nokia N1 features a bit better camera than HP ProPad 600. Both have a 8 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The HP ProPad 600 has much more memory to install applications and games than Nokia N1, because it has 64 GB internal storage. HP ProPad 600 has a superior battery performance than Nokia N1, because it has a 58% greater battery size.
Although Nokia N1 is a better device, it costs a lot more than HP ProPad 600, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HP ProPad 600. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy HP ProPad 600, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.