Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 66.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Nokia |
| Windows 8.1 | Android 11 |
| 2014-02-23 | 2021-10-06 |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 9.75 x 6.20 x 0.31 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 16.58 ounces |
| -- | Ocean Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 2000 x 1200 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Unisoc Tiger T610 chipset |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Intel GPU | Mali G52 MP2 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 6.38 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 8200mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia T20 is better than the HP ProPad 600, getting a 66.3 score against 58.2. The Nokia T20 comes with Android 11 operating system, while HP ProPad 600 counts with Windows 8.1 operating system. The Nokia T20 is a noticeably newer tablet, and it is also extremely lighter and much thinner than HP ProPad 600.
The HP ProPad 600 counts with a brighter screen than Nokia T20, although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1200 x 1920, they both have the same screen pixels density. The Nokia T20 features a bit better performance than HP ProPad 600, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Nokia T20 features a bit better camera than HP ProPad 600. They have the same resolution back camera. Nokia T20 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HP ProPad 600. They have exactly the same internal memory. The HP ProPad 600 has a bit superior battery performance than Nokia T20, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity.
The Nokia T20 costs a lot more money than HP ProPad 600, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.