Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
58.257.9
Basic Information
HP
Windows 8.1Android 14
2014-02-23--
10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches--
23.00 ounces18.84 ounces
--Space Grey; Sky Blue
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 155.00--
Display / Screen
10.1 inches10.9 inches
1920 x 1200 pixels --
--IPS LCD
224 pixels per inch--
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.85.8
Performance
--Unisoc T606 chipset
Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM8 GB RAM
Intel GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.558.91
Storage
64 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slotNo SD card slot
7.710.1
Camera
8.00 MP + 2.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
6.387.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
--Nano SIM
2.40
Battery Life
8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery7700mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
9.28.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 5.0
--GPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The HP ProPad 600 has a general score of 58.2, which is a bit better than OSCAL Pad 90's global score of 57.9. The HP ProPad 600 counts with Windows 8.1 OS, while OSCAL Pad 90 has Android 14 OS. The OSCAL Pad 90 has a bit more powerful CPU than HP ProPad 600, because it has a larger number of 1.6 GHz cores and a higher amount of RAM.

The HP ProPad 600 has a lot better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 90, although it has a quite smaller screen. OSCAL Pad 90 features a superior memory to install applications and games than HP ProPad 600, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.

HP ProPad 600 counts with a little better battery duration than OSCAL Pad 90, because it has an 8380mAh battery size against 7700mAh. OSCAL Pad 90 has a lot better camera than HP ProPad 600, because it has a way better 13 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.