Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 65 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Samsung |
| Windows 8.1 | Windows 8 |
| 2014-02-23 | 2013-06-20 |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 10.13 x 6.51 x 0.32 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 20.46 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| -- | Super PLS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| -- | 400 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Intel Atom Z2760 chipset |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Saltwell (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 2 GB (400 MHz) RAM |
| Intel GPU | PowerVR SGX 545 @ 533 MHz GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 5.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung ATIV Tab 3 is better than HP ProPad 600, with a general score of 65 against 58.2. Both tablets in this comparison review come with Windows OS, but Samsung ATIV Tab 3 has 8 version while HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1. Samsung ATIV Tab 3's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than HP ProPad 600, even when both of them were released only 8 months apart.
The HP ProPad 600 features a bit faster processor than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and more CPU cores (although they are slower). HP ProPad 600 features a bit better screen than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, and although they both have a display of the same size, the HP ProPad 600 also has a better display density and a much better 1200 x 1920 resolution.
The Samsung ATIV Tab 3 has as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the HP ProPad 600 one, and although the Samsung ATIV Tab 3 has no SD extension slot, they both have the same internal storage. HP ProPad 600 has a superior camera than Samsung ATIV Tab 3, because it has a way more megapixels back camera.
The HP ProPad 600 features a much longer battery performance than Samsung ATIV Tab 3.
The Samsung ATIV Tab 3 is not only the best tablets in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this tablet a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.