Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 57.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Xiaomi |
| Windows 8.1 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-02-23 | 2021-09-23 |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 18.03 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic Black and Pearl White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 155.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 11 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485 Gold, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Intel GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.55 | 3.78 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 8720mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 9.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
HP ProPad 600 has an overall score of 58.2, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi pad 5's score of 57.7. HP ProPad 600 works with Windows 8.1 operating system, while Xiaomi pad 5 comes with Android 12 operating system. HP ProPad 600's design is incredibly older, extremely thicker and extremely heavier than the Xiaomi pad 5.
HP ProPad 600 features a more vivid display than Xiaomi pad 5, although it has a bit smaller display, a much lower resolution of 1200 x 1920 pixels and a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi pad 5 has much more memory for apps and games than HP ProPad 600, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The HP ProPad 600 has a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi pad 5, although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and less RAM memory. Xiaomi pad 5 shoots greater videos and photos than HP ProPad 600, because it has a back facing camera with a much better 13 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi pad 5 counts with a bit longer battery duration than HP ProPad 600, because it has a 4% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.