Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 56.4 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | HP |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Windows 8.1 |
| 2011-03-22 | 2014-02-23 |
| 7.70 x 4.40 x 0.52 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 15.00 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| 170 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | -- |
| Single-Core 1500 MHz processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Intel GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.05 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | -- |
| 2.6 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
HP ProPad 600 has an overall score of 58.2, which is a little bit better than the HTC EVO View 4G's 56.4 score. The HP ProPad 600 body is notably newer and way thinner than HTC EVO View 4G's, but it is also way heavier. The HP ProPad 600 works with Windows 8.1 operating system, and HTC EVO View 4G works with Android 3.2 operating system.
HP ProPad 600 has a bit faster processor than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. HP ProPad 600 features a brighter screen than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a lot larger screen, a much better resolution of 1200 x 1920px and a better number of pixels per inch in the display.
HP ProPad 600 counts with a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC EVO View 4G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. HP ProPad 600 has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a 110 percent larger battery capacity.
The HP ProPad 600 captures clearer videos and photos than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a camera with a lot higher 8 mega pixels resolution.
Although HP ProPad 600 is a better device, it costs more than HTC EVO View 4G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC EVO View 4G. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the HP ProPad 600, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the HTC EVO View 4G, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.