Compare tablets
Nokia Lumia 2520
VerizonRX-114
| Global Score | |
| 56.4 | 68.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Windows RT 8.1 |
| 2011-03-22 | 2013-10-22 |
| 7.70 x 4.40 x 0.52 inches | 10.51 x 6.61 x 0.35 inches |
| 15.00 ounces | 21.69 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| $ 120.00 | $ 159.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 170 pixels per inch | 218 pixels per inch |
| -- | 665 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Single-Core 1500 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 7.12 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 6.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.29 inches (1/3.4") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 8.25 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 600 hours standby time |
| 5.92 | 8.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Lumia 2520 has a general score of 68.6, which is a lot better than HTC EVO View 4G's global score of 56.4. Lumia 2520's design is much newer and extremely thinner than HTC EVO View 4G's, although it is also notably heavier. Lumia 2520 has Windows RT 8.1 OS, and HTC EVO View 4G counts with Android 3.2 OS.
The Nokia Lumia 2520 has a more powerful CPU than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has an extra graphics processor, more RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster). The Lumia 2520 has a lot better looking screen than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 1920, a higher count of pixels per screen inch and a way larger screen.
The Lumia 2520 counts with as much memory to install applications and games as the HTC EVO View 4G, both of them have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 32 GB and exactly the same 32 GB internal storage. Lumia 2520 counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has an 8000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Lumia 2520 has a lot better camera than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a way higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a way better 6.7 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Nokia Lumia 2520 costs more than HTC EVO View 4G, but you can get a much better tablet for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.