| Global Score | |
| 56.4 | 66.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Android 4.4, 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0 |
| 2011-03-22 | 2012-02-27 |
| 7.70 x 4.40 x 0.52 inches | 10.31 x 7.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 15.00 ounces | 21.16 ounces |
| $ 120.00 | $ 435.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| -- | Super PLS LCD |
| 170 pixels per inch | 149 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| Single-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 9.02 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.6 | 4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 7000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Galaxy Note 10.1 has a global score of 66.3, which is much better than HTC EVO View 4G's 56.4 global score. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 10.1 has a newer 4.4 version and HTC EVO View 4G has Android 3.2, so it gives you a lot of extra features and optimized performance. Galaxy Note 10.1 is a newer and noticeably thinner tablet than HTC EVO View 4G, although it is also much heavier.
Galaxy Note 10.1 has just a bit better hardware performance than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 3 more processing cores. HTC EVO View 4G features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1, because although it has a way smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 600 x 1024, it also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC EVO View 4G, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 32 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 also has 64 GB internal storage capacity. The HTC EVO View 4G has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1. They have the same video frame rate, the same video resolution and a 5 mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 features a really longer battery duration than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 10.1 is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC EVO View 4G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC EVO View 4G. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the HTC EVO View 4G, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.