| Global Score | |
| 56.4 | 63 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Android 4.4.2, 4.1 |
| 2011-03-22 | 2013-01-07 |
| 7.70 x 4.40 x 0.52 inches | 10.30 x 7.00 x 0.35 inches |
| 15.00 ounces | 20.80 ounces |
| $ 120.00 | $ 605.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| 170 pixels per inch | 149 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | Samsung Exynos chipset |
| Single-Core 1500 MHz processor | Quad-Core 1400 MHz processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Yes GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 720 hours standby time |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 LTE is better than the HTC EVO View 4G, getting a overall score of 63 against 56.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 LTE construction is newer and noticeably thinner than the HTC EVO View 4G's, although it is also heavier. Both tablets in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 LTE has a newer 4.4.2 version while HTC EVO View 4G has Android 3.2, giving you lots of additional features and performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 LTE features a bit faster CPU than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a higher number of cores (although slower) and more RAM memory. HTC EVO View 4G counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 LTE, because although it has a really smaller screen and a way worse 600 x 1024 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 LTE features a camera that's very similar to the camera in HTC EVO View 4G, they have the same 1280x720 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same resolution back-facing camera. The HTC EVO View 4G has a greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 LTE, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 32 GB smaller, it also counts with 16 GB more internal memory.
HTC EVO View 4G features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 LTE.
Although Galaxy Note 10.1 LTE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC EVO View 4G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC EVO View 4G. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 10.1 LTE, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the HTC EVO View 4G, resigning some features and specs.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.