Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 56.4 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Android 5.1 Lollipop |
| 2011-03-22 | 2016-04-01 |
| 7.70 x 4.40 x 0.52 inches | 7.36 x 4.28 x 0.34 inches |
| 15.00 ounces | 9.98 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| $ 120.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 170 pixels per inch | 216 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 chipset |
| Single-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1,5 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T720 GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 6.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 6.71 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | -- |
| 2.6 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Tab A (2016) is a little bit better than HTC EVO View 4G, getting a general score of 60.4 against 56.4. Both of these tablets use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Tab A (2016) has a more recent 5.1 Lollipop version and HTC EVO View 4G has Android 3.2, providing the user a couple additional features. Galaxy Tab A (2016) is a extremely newer tablet device, and it's also much thinner and lighter than HTC EVO View 4G.
HTC EVO View 4G and Galaxy Tab A (2016) both have similar screens, and although the Galaxy Tab A (2016) has a better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a higher 800 x 1280 resolution, they both have a screen of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) counts with a bit better processor than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has 512 MB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) features a better camera than HTC EVO View 4G. Both have the same video frame rates, the same video resolution and a 5 mega-pixels back camera. The HTC EVO View 4G counts with a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), because although it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 32 GB against 200 GB, it also counts with 24 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery duration in HTC EVO View 4G.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) is more expensive than the HTC EVO View 4G, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better tablet for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.