| Global Score | |
| 56.4 | 65.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Android |
| 2011-03-22 | 2015-11-27 |
| 7.70 x 4.40 x 0.52 inches | 7.89 x 5.22 x 0.27 inches |
| 15.00 ounces | 11.36 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 120.00 | $ 203.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 2048 x 1536 pixels |
| 170 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | Intel Atom x5 Z850 chipset |
| Single-Core 1500 MHz processor | 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Yes GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | -- |
| 2.6 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6190mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 has an overall score of 65.7, which is better than HTC EVO View 4G's 56.4 general score. Xiaomi Mi Pad 2's body is newer, thinner and noticeably lighter than the HTC EVO View 4G. Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 counts with Android OS, while HTC EVO View 4G has Android 3.2 OS.
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 has a better processing power than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 3 more cores. Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 features a much better display than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a little bit bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1536 x 2048px and a lot higher display pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 counts with a bit bigger storage for games and applications than HTC EVO View 4G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 has a superior battery lifetime than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a 55 percent more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a way better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a way more megapixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 costs a lot more than the HTC EVO View 4G, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better tablet for that extra money.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.