Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.3 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HP |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Windows 8.1 |
| -- | 2014-02-23 |
| 8.30 x 4.89 x 0.31 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 10.90 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 283 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Intel GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 11.36 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.05 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | -- |
| 5.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4800mAh Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG G Pad III 8.0 has an overall score of 64.3, which is better than HP ProPad 600's 58.2 score. LG G Pad III 8.0 is a much lighter and noticeably thinner tablet than the HP ProPad 600. LG G Pad III 8.0 counts with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system, while HP ProPad 600 counts with Windows 8.1 operating system.
The LG G Pad III 8.0 features a bit more powerful CPU than HP ProPad 600, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more processing cores (although they are slower). HP ProPad 600 features just a bit better screen than LG G Pad III 8.0, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1200 x 1920 resolution, the HP ProPad 600 also counts with a bigger screen.
The HP ProPad 600 captures slightly better videos and photos than LG G Pad III 8.0, because it has a back camera with a way better resolution. The LG G Pad III 8.0 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than HP ProPad 600, although it has less internal memory. The HP ProPad 600 counts with a superior battery duration than LG G Pad III 8.0, because it has a 75 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.