Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
66.559.3
Basic Information
Microsoft
Windows 10Android 14
2018-08-02--
9.65 x 6.89 x 0.33 inches--
18.41 ounces17.46 ounces
16 777 216Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue
Metal --
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 367.00--
Display / Screen
10 inches10.5 inches
1200 x 1800 pixels --
--IPS LCD
216 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.75.8
Performance
Intel Pentium 4415Y chipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset
64-bit, 14 nm (Dual-Core 1600 MHz) processor Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor
8 GB RAM6 GB RAM
Intel HD Graphics 615 GPUMali-G57 GPU
8.468.82
Storage
128 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.113.3
Camera
8.00 MP + 5.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution--
6.497.92
Networks
Wi-Fi--
2.40
Battery Life
--8200mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
1.369.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.0
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Microsoft Surface Go is much better than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, having a global score of 66.5 against 59.3. Microsoft Surface Go counts with Windows 10 OS, while OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with Android 14 OS. Microsoft Surface Go has a sharper screen than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a bit smaller display.

The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Microsoft Surface Go, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of 1600 megahertz cores. OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Microsoft Surface Go, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.

OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features a way better camera than Microsoft Surface Go, because it has a lot better 13 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Microsoft Surface Go.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.