Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
55.159.2
Basic Information
MotorolaFujitsu
Android 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0.4, 4.0, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0Windows 8 Pro
2011-02-14--
9.80 x 6.61 x 0.51 inches11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches
25.75 ounces29.92 ounces
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 409.00$ 1149.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches11.6 inches
1280 x 800 pixels 1366 x 768 pixels
--AH-IPS
149 pixels per inch135 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.56.9
Performance
NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset--
Dual-Core 1000 MHz processorIntel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor
1 GB RAM4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM
Yes GPUIntel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU
7.658.91
Storage
32 GB internal memory256 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotSD, SDHC external memory slot
7.1213.3
Camera
5.00 MP + 2.00 MP5.00 MP
1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
6.825.5
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
2.42.4
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery3150mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
1.365.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 4.0
GPS--
Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer

Comparison review

The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a little bit better than the Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, having a 59.2 score against 55.1. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 works with Windows 8 Pro OS, and Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi works with Android 4.1.2 OS. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a just a little thinner but heavier tablet than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi.

The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a slightly better screen than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 768 x 1366 resolution and a little larger display. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with a better performing processor than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, and although they both have a Dual-Core processor, the Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 also has 3 GB more RAM and a graphics processing unit.

Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi captures much clearer photographs and videos than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702. Both of them have the same video definition, the same video frame rates and the same resolution back-facing camera. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.

Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi.

Although Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, resigning some specifications.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.