Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HP |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0.4, 4.0, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0 | Windows 8.1 |
| 2011-02-14 | 2014-02-23 |
| 9.80 x 6.61 x 0.51 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 25.75 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 409.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| 149 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset | -- |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Intel GPU |
| 7.65 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.82 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
HP ProPad 600 has a score of 58.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi's 55.1 score. The HP ProPad 600 comes with Windows 8.1 operating system, while Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi comes with Android 4.1.2 operating system. HP ProPad 600's construction is incredibly newer, somewhat lighter and way thinner than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi.
The HP ProPad 600 has a better performance than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The HP ProPad 600 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, and although they both have a display with the same size, the HP ProPad 600 also has a much better resolution of 1200 x 1920 and a lot better screen pixel density.
The Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi features just a bit better camera than HP ProPad 600, although it has a lot worse resolution camera in the back. HP ProPad 600 has just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
The HP ProPad 600 counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi.
HP ProPad 600 not only is the best tablets between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.