Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 58.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0.4, 4.0, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0 | Android 4.4 |
| 2011-02-14 | -- |
| 9.80 x 6.61 x 0.51 inches | 7.61 x 4.58 x 0.38 inches |
| 25.75 ounces | 11.36 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 409.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 600 x 1024 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 149 pixels per inch | 170 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset | -- |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Single-Core 1300 MHz processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Yes GPU |
| 7.65 | 7.74 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 2.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 640 x 480 (24 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 5.83 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 4.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 18 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Galaxy Tab 3 V has a score of 58.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi's global score of 55.1. These tablets come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Tab 3 V has 4.4 version and Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi has Android 4.1.2, giving lots of additional features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy Tab 3 V body is thinner and much lighter than the Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi.
Galaxy Tab 3 V features a little better performance than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy Tab 3 V counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, because although it has a way worse 1024 x 600px resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi has a much better camera than Galaxy Tab 3 V, because it has a lot higher (HD) video resolution and a lot more megapixels camera. The Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 V, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 32 GB, the Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi also has 32 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 V has a way better battery performance than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi.
In addition to being the best tablet in our comparison, Galaxy Tab 3 V is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.