Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 55.9 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HP |
| Android 4.0, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0 | Windows 8.1 |
| 2011-02-14 | 2014-02-23 |
| 9.80 x 6.61 x 0.51 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 25.75 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| 149 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 7.8 |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Intel GPU |
| 7.65 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.82 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 3.3 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The HP ProPad 600 has a global score of 58.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola XOOM's overall score of 55.9. The HP ProPad 600 counts with Windows 8.1 OS, while Motorola XOOM comes with Android 4.0 OS. The HP ProPad 600 design is incredibly newer, a lot thinner and lighter than Motorola XOOM.
The HP ProPad 600 has a better performing CPU than Motorola XOOM, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). HP ProPad 600 counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola XOOM, and although they both have a same size screen, the HP ProPad 600 also has a way better resolution of 1200 x 1920px and much more pixels per inch of display.
HP ProPad 600 has a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola XOOM, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory capacity. HP ProPad 600 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola XOOM. The Motorola XOOM shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than HP ProPad 600, although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega pixels.
In addition to being the best tablet between the ones we are comparing, the HP ProPad 600 is also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.