Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HP |
| Android 5.0 | Windows 8.1 |
| 2014-11-18 | 2014-02-23 |
| 7.90 x 5.46 x 0.27 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 11.22 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Gray | -- |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 370.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1536 x 2048 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 324 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom chipset | -- |
| 64-bit Z3580 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR G6430 (600 MHz) GPU | Intel GPU |
| 10.08 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.49 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 3 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia N1 is much better than the HP ProPad 600, with a general score of 66 against 58.2. The Nokia N1 design is noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner than the HP ProPad 600, even though both of them were released only a couple months apart. Nokia N1 has Android 5.0 operating system, and HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1 operating system.
The Nokia N1 has a better processing power than HP ProPad 600, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 4 cores, the Nokia N1 also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor. The Nokia N1 has a much better display than HP ProPad 600, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2048 x 1536 pixels and a better screen density.
HP ProPad 600 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Nokia N1, because it has 32 GB more internal storage. HP ProPad 600 features a very superior battery duration than Nokia N1, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity. Nokia N1 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than HP ProPad 600. Both of them have a 8 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Although Nokia N1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HP ProPad 600, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HP ProPad 600. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Nokia N1, else you can save some dollars and get the HP ProPad 600, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.