Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 66.3 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HP |
| Android 11 | Windows 8.1 |
| 2021-10-06 | 2014-02-23 |
| 9.75 x 6.20 x 0.31 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 16.58 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Ocean Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.4 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 2000 x 1200 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 224 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T610 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G52 MP2 GPU | Intel GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 6.49 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Nano SIM Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 9.12 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia T20 has a general score of 66.3, which is better than HP ProPad 600's global score of 58.2. Nokia T20 counts with Android 11 OS, and HP ProPad 600 comes with Windows 8.1 OS. The Nokia T20 construction is a lot newer, incredibly thinner and noticeably lighter than HP ProPad 600. The HP ProPad 600 has a better screen than Nokia T20, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1200 x 1920px and a little bit smaller screen, they both have the same pixel density.
Nokia T20 features a little better processing power than HP ProPad 600, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. The Nokia T20 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HP ProPad 600. They have equal 64 GB internal memory.
Nokia T20 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than HP ProPad 600. They have a back-facing camera with an 8 megapixels resolution. HP ProPad 600 counts with a little better battery life than Nokia T20, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery size.
Nokia T20 is way more expensive than HP ProPad 600, but you can get a better tablet for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.