Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 68.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Amazon | |
| Android 12 | Android 4.2.2 |
| 2023-01-09 | 2013-09-25 |
| 9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 inches | 9.09 x 6.22 x 0.31 inches |
| 18.91 ounces | 13.55 ounces |
| Diamond Grey, Mint Green and Moonlight Silver | Black |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| -- | LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 339 pixels per inch |
| -- | 400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| UNISOC T606 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8074 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 6.93 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 5.8 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6580mAh Battery | -- |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 has a global score of 68.5, which is much better than OSCAL Pad 10's overall score of 57.3. Even though Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 is a lot older than the OSCAL Pad 10, it's construction is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner. Both tablets in this review have Android OS, but the Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 has 4.2.2 version while OSCAL Pad 10 has Android 12 version, so it counts with some additional features and performance optimizations.
The Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 features a lot better display than OSCAL Pad 10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1600 x 2560 resolution and a way greater screen pixel density. Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 counts with a much better processing power than OSCAL Pad 10, because although it has 6 GB less RAM and less cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
OSCAL Pad 10 counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. OSCAL Pad 10 counts with a very superior battery performance than Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9.
The OSCAL Pad 10 counts with a little bit better camera than Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9, because it has a way higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.