Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 Lollipop |
| 2023-01-09 | 2016-04-01 |
| 9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 inches | 7.36 x 4.28 x 0.34 inches |
| 18.91 ounces | 9.98 ounces |
| Diamond Grey, Mint Green and Moonlight Silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 224 pixels per inch | 216 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| UNISOC T606 chipset | Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 1,5 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 6.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.71 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 5.8 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6580mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) is a little bit better than the OSCAL Pad 10, having a score of 60.4 against 57.3. Both tablets in this review include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) has a newer 5.1 Lollipop version and OSCAL Pad 10 has Android 12, so it provides you a couple additional features and increased performance. Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016)'s construction is lighter and a little thinner than the OSCAL Pad 10, even though it was released 7 years before.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) features a much powerful CPU than OSCAL Pad 10, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less processing cores (although faster). The Galaxy Tab A (2016) features a little more vivid screen than OSCAL Pad 10, although it has a lot smaller display, a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a way worse resolution of 800 x 1280.
OSCAL Pad 10 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a back camera with much more mega pixels. The OSCAL Pad 10 has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The OSCAL Pad 10 has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a 65 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.