| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2023-01-09 | 2020-09-28 |
| 9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 inches | 8.42 x 4.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 18.91 ounces | 15.03 ounces |
| Diamond Grey, Mint Green and Moonlight Silver | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 490.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 283 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| UNISOC T606 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 5.8 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6580mAh Battery | 5050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Galaxy Tab Active 3 is much better than the OSCAL Pad 10, getting a global score of 79 against 57.3. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Tab Active 3 has older 10 version and OSCAL Pad 10 has Android 12. Even though Galaxy Tab Active 3 is extremely older and thicker than the OSCAL Pad 10, it's design is still incredibly lighter.
Galaxy Tab Active 3 features a much better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 10, because although it has a way smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1200 x 1920px, the Galaxy Tab Active 3 also counts with a higher pixel density. OSCAL Pad 10 counts with a better storage for applications and games than Galaxy Tab Active 3, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB, the OSCAL Pad 10 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Tab Active 3 features a very superior processing unit than OSCAL Pad 10, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy Tab Active 3 shoots way better videos and photos than OSCAL Pad 10. Both of them have a back camera with a 13 mega-pixels resolution.
The OSCAL Pad 10 has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 3, because it has 6580mAh of battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.