| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 74.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2023-01-09 | 2014-06-12 |
| 9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 inches | 8.38 x 4.94 x 0.26 inches |
| 18.91 ounces | 10.51 ounces |
| Diamond Grey, Mint Green and Moonlight Silver | Black and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 166.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1600 x 2560 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 224 pixels per inch | 359 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| UNISOC T606 chipset | Exynos 5 Octa 5420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.8 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6580mAh Battery | 4900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 29 hours talk time |
| 8 | 6.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Galaxy Tab S 8.4 has a global score of 74.5, which is way better than the OSCAL Pad 10's 57.3 general score. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Tab S 8.4 has a newer 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 10 has Android 12. Galaxy Tab S 8.4's body is extremely thinner and way lighter than OSCAL Pad 10, although it was released many years before.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 has a much more powerful processor than OSCAL Pad 10, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 counts with a way better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better display pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1600.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 counts with just a bit better camera than OSCAL Pad 10, although it has a way worse resolution camera in the back. The OSCAL Pad 10 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Tab S 8.4, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity.
OSCAL Pad 10 counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Tab S 8.4, because it has a 6580mAh battery capacity against 4900mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.