Compare tablets
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702
256 GB Core i5| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 59.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Fujitsu | |
| Android 12 | Windows 8 Pro |
| 2023-04-17 | -- |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 11.89 x 7.68 x 0.50 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 29.92 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | -- |
| $ 140.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AH-IPS |
| 214 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | -- |
| processor | Intel Core i5-3427U (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | SD, SDHC external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 3150mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is just a bit better than OSCAL Pad 13, with a global score of 59.2 against 57.3. Although it's the best tablet in this review, Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702's body is much thicker and much heavier than OSCAL Pad 13. Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 works with Windows 8 Pro OS, and OSCAL Pad 13 comes with Android 12 OS.
Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 has a bit better screen than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has a way worse 768 x 1366 resolution and a lot lower count of pixels in each display inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 features a much more powerful processor than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a much better camera than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has a way higher 13 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera. OSCAL Pad 13 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702. Both of them have equal internal memory.
The OSCAL Pad 13 features a much better battery life than Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702, because it has 7680mAh of battery capacity.
Although Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q702 is a better device, it costs a lot more than OSCAL Pad 13, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the OSCAL Pad 13. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the OSCAL Pad 13, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.