Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | |
| Android 12 | Windows 8.1 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2014-02-23 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 140.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 214 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | -- |
| processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Intel GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 6.93 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The HP ProPad 600 is slightly better than OSCAL Pad 13, with a 58.2 score against 57.3. HP ProPad 600 works with Windows 8.1 operating system, while OSCAL Pad 13 works with Android 12 operating system. Although it's the best we are comparing, it must be noted that it is also a older, extremely heavier and much thicker device.
The HP ProPad 600 has a much faster processor than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has 4 lesser cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory. The HP ProPad 600 counts with a much better looking display than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1200 x 1920.
OSCAL Pad 13 features a slightly better camera than HP ProPad 600, because it has a lot better 13 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HP ProPad 600, because it has 256 GB internal memory. HP ProPad 600 counts with a little longer battery life than OSCAL Pad 13, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity.
Although HP ProPad 600 is a better device, it is a little more expensive than the OSCAL Pad 13, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the OSCAL Pad 13. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy HP ProPad 600, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the OSCAL Pad 13, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.