Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 69.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Windows 8 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2012-08-29 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 11.97 x 7.46 x 0.39 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 26.46 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | Blue |
| $ 140.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 214 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | -- |
| processor | Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Intel SGX545 Graphics GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 6.93 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| 2.4 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 4080mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 144 hours standby time |
| 8.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung ATIV Tab 5 has a general score of 69.2, which is a lot better than the OSCAL Pad 13's 57.3 overall score. Samsung ATIV Tab 5 is better than OSCAL Pad 13, it must be told that it's also notably older, incredibly thicker and extremely heavier. The Samsung ATIV Tab 5 works with Windows 8 OS, and OSCAL Pad 13 counts with Android 12 OS.
The Samsung ATIV Tab 5 features a little bit better screen than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has a lot worse count of pixels per display inch and a way lower 768 x 1366 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung ATIV Tab 5, because it has more internal memory.
The Samsung ATIV Tab 5 has a much greater hardware performance than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has lesser RAM and 6 lesser cpu cores. OSCAL Pad 13 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung ATIV Tab 5, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera. OSCAL Pad 13 has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung ATIV Tab 5, because it has 7680mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung ATIV Tab 5 costs a lot more than OSCAL Pad 13, but you can get a much better tablet for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.