Compare tablets
Samsung Ativ Tab
64 GBP8510
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 66.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Windows RT |
| 2023-04-17 | 2012-08-29 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 10.46 x 6.62 x 0.35 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 20.11 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | -- |
| $ 140.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 214 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A chipset |
| processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 8200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Ativ Tab has a general score of 66.7, which is better than OSCAL Pad 13's general score of 57.3. The Samsung Ativ Tab counts with Windows RT OS, while OSCAL Pad 13 counts with Android 12 OS. Although it's the best tablet in this comparison, Samsung Ativ Tab's body is noticeably older, somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier than the OSCAL Pad 13.
Samsung Ativ Tab counts with a way better performance than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 6 lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Samsung Ativ Tab counts with just a bit better looking display than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a way worse 768 x 1366 resolution, a much worse number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a little smaller display.
OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Ativ Tab, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB and 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Ativ Tab features a little better battery life than OSCAL Pad 13, because it has 8200mAh of battery capacity.
OSCAL Pad 13 shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Ativ Tab, because it has a way better 13 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Although Samsung Ativ Tab is a better device, it costs a lot more than the OSCAL Pad 13, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the OSCAL Pad 13. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the OSCAL Pad 13, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.