Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 66.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4, 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2012-02-27 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 10.31 x 7.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 21.16 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | -- |
| $ 140.00 | $ 435.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super PLS LCD |
| 214 pixels per inch | 149 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | ARM Mali GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 9.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 7000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 has an overall score of 66.3, which is better than OSCAL Pad 13's score of 57.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 is a better portable tablet than the OSCAL Pad 13, we must tell that it's also incredibly older, thicker and incredibly heavier. Both tablets in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 has the older 4.4 version while OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 counts with a much better performance than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has 4 lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 features a little sharper display than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a lot worse 800 x 1280 resolution, a little smaller display and a lot lower pixel density.
OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB and 192 GB more internal memory. The OSCAL Pad 13 features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
The OSCAL Pad 13 takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 10.1, because it has a back camera with a way better 13 megapixels resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the OSCAL Pad 13, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as OSCAL Pad 13. If you want to save some money, you can buy OSCAL Pad 13, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.