Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 58.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 4.0.4, 3.0 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2011-03-22 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 10.09 x 6.81 x 0.34 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 19.93 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 140.00 | $ 410.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 214 pixels per inch | 149 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | -- |
| processor | Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | -- |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 7.47 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 3.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 3.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 6800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 8.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 has a general score of 58.1, which is slightly better than the OSCAL Pad 13's 57.3 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 is an a lot older, thicker and a lot heavier tablet than the OSCAL Pad 13. These tablets have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 has 4.0.4 version and OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy Tab 10.1 counts with a much greater performance than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a lower number of cores. Galaxy Tab 10.1 has a more vivid screen than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a lot worse 800 x 1280 resolution, a little bit smaller screen and a much lower screen density. The OSCAL Pad 13 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Tab 10.1, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory.
OSCAL Pad 13 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, because it has a way more megapixels back-facing camera. The OSCAL Pad 13 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Tab 10.1, because it has a 7680mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Tab 10.1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the OSCAL Pad 13, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the OSCAL Pad 13. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy OSCAL Pad 13, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.